I have been using this software since 2003 and thus am familiar with how it works.
O/S is XP-PRO-SP2 with 768MB Ram on an Athlon XP 2400+ processor and ADSL.
I find that it takes a VERY long time to complete the task of erasing just the 'C' drive.
on the past two occasions I have...
i have been using eraser since version 5.4 and after downloading version 5.7 and finiding it to be even more sluggish than version 5.4, I went back to version 5.6 which is fast and in my opinion the best yet.
I have a friend whose PC I am trying to make secure and cannot seem to find a site...
I saw that version 5.7 was available and have downloaded but not executed.
I get the sense that the version only has <i>minor</i> mofifications.
in your opinion is there a great advantage to using it or is it recommended to stay with versioin 56?
belive the first newsletter had some information to the effect that you need to install eraser on a drive different than the one you want to erase.
I am upgrading to a larger H/D and intend to make 3 partitions. I intend to run Windows98SE on the <b>first</b> partition, use the...
i had the hang problem with Eraser 554.
to clarify, the scan took upwards of 5 hours to complete and this was unused disc space.
the scan was done, with all running programs closed using either the ctrl+alt+del method or Enditall2.
I found this a bit odd, because I know of another...
Do not use DBAN if you only wish to wipe the swap file.
there was a swap file cleaner with e554 but I could never get it to function.
i deleted it when I became aware of e56.
still would like to erase the swp file.
using Win98 i start, tap F-8 rapidly and get to command...
i downloaded and installed e56 after i removed e554.
I also created the boot disc on floppy.
there is one problem I noticed with e56.
as I understand the function of eraser, it is two fold:
a. it overwrites unused disc space 35 times etc. but cannot erase cluster tips of...