After I was forced to restore my computer to its original settings, I wanted to have Eraser back, so I downloaded the latest version, which was 6.0.8, if I'm not mistaken. The first time I tried erasing a file with the new version, however, I noticed a big difference for the worse. Whereas the old version would wipe out small files in an instant, the new version took about a minute just to start erasing a small file, and considerably longer for a large file, the folder in which the file was located being non-responsive in the meantime. When it did at long last start erasing, it was also slower than before (I would say 2 or 3 times). So I uninstalled version 6.x and installed version 5.7 which I found somewhere on the 'Net.
My question: is there a good reason not to do that? Version 6.x has a prettier interface and more choices as to the erasing algorithm, but given its slowness, I'm quite willing to live without those. Is there some kind of vulnerability with version 5.x that makes it unwise to still use it? I appreciate any input from knowledgeable individuals.
My question: is there a good reason not to do that? Version 6.x has a prettier interface and more choices as to the erasing algorithm, but given its slowness, I'm quite willing to live without those. Is there some kind of vulnerability with version 5.x that makes it unwise to still use it? I appreciate any input from knowledgeable individuals.