Eraser wipes the free space. If it wiped the drive you would soon know - you wouldn't be able to boot your computer.EraserBaba said:I installed Eraser an ran it on all my local drives, from what I observed it like it was wipe my hard drive and not the free space.
Does this program wipe an entire drive or just the free space?
Joel said:After the Free space is wiped then the MFT may be erased. It is not a thorough clearing since the MFT is itself a complicated beast and the OS has handles open to it all the time.
Not if they let their erasure pass run to completion. If they run their erasures to completion the algorithm will be the same as that in v5. FAT32 users however will lose their FAT old entries erase.Overwriter said:Unfortunately I was meaning better as in a more thorough clean.
As I don’t know the technical details I wonder if you could perhaps explain what this is going to mean for V6 users running Vista ? Are they going to be less secure after a pass with Eraser than an XP user is now ?
No, Windows is Windows. Use Linux if you're really THAT paranoid. Either that or someone could send me research on how to do it. Preferably through documented (read: Microsoft-sanctioned) methods. I do not like using undocumented functions (like in v5) because when service packs and new versions are released these undocumented methods break, just like how v5 now is not as usable in terms of functionality under Vista as it was with NT4.Overwriter said:Is there really nothing that can be done to improve the MFT cleaning process ?
Same for both - read my undocumented bit above.Overwriter said:Also if V6 is used on XP will V6 be able to employ a lower access than it does with Vista ? I guess this question is can V6 differentiate between XP and Vista and change how it cleans the MFT or will it just be the same for both ?
:lol:No, Windows is Windows
I do not like using undocumented functions (like in v5) because when service packs and new versions are released these undocumented methods break,
Sorry if this is disappointing, but pragmatism has to persist (on my part). I can't just port all the code now from v5 to v6 without caring if it may break in the future. Also with the introduction of 64 bit computers these undocumented methods becomes all the more risky.