bennythomos
Member
Manual Methods (Outlook Export, Archive, Drag-and-Drop)
Best for: Small, healthy OST files that are still connected to Outlook.
Pros: Free, no extra software, simple for basic export.
Cons: Slow, limited features, cannot convert orphaned or corrupted OST files, requires Outlook and a working profile.
Automated Methods (BLR OST to PST Converter Tool)
Best for: Corrupted, orphaned, large, or multiple OST files.
Pros: Fast, accurate, preserves folder structure, recovers damaged files, works without Outlook, supports filtering & batch conversion.
Cons: Paid tools, need to trust the vendor.
Bottom line:
For simple cases, manual work.
For anything important or complex, automated conversion is the safest and most effective option.
Best for: Small, healthy OST files that are still connected to Outlook.
Pros: Free, no extra software, simple for basic export.
Cons: Slow, limited features, cannot convert orphaned or corrupted OST files, requires Outlook and a working profile.
Automated Methods (BLR OST to PST Converter Tool)
Best for: Corrupted, orphaned, large, or multiple OST files.
Pros: Fast, accurate, preserves folder structure, recovers damaged files, works without Outlook, supports filtering & batch conversion.
Cons: Paid tools, need to trust the vendor.
What Works Best?
- Use manual methods only for small, accessible OST files.
- Use automated tools when the OST file is corrupted, orphaned, large, or when you need a reliable, complete, and quick conversion.
Bottom line:
For simple cases, manual work.
For anything important or complex, automated conversion is the safest and most effective option.