Overwriter
Active Member
This accusation is more commonly thrown at encryption software. The usual question is “if you have got nothing to hide then why do you need to encrypt it ?”. Well, the next time you hear that little gem from someone ask to look through the contents of their pockets or bag, when they object ask them what they have to hide !
Eraser is clearly not encryption software but it does suffer from the same irrational allegations of it only being used by criminals in helping destroy evidence against them.
It is true that Eraser could be used by criminals to destroy evidence from a computer hard drive. Should it be banned ? Well if so then you need to also ban computers as the very crime that Eraser is accused of covering up was clearly committed on a computer !
Hard drives are so cheap today that any criminal using a computer to commit a crime would think nothing of physically destroying an inexpensive disk to cover their tracks. Eraser is little use or gain to criminals.
Eraser is however very useful in preventing crime !
When an Eraser user wipes their free space or securely erases a confidential file containing bank details, customer records, credit card details, personal medical records, insurance details, women’s refuge address’s, witness names and address’s, witness statements, passwords, private letters, safe combinations, private diaries, companies unpatented work, voter details, copyrighted material, etc, etc, etc, you get the idea ! That Eraser user is safe in the knowledge that should their computer be stolen the information within the free space is securely overwritten and of no use to the criminal. Hopefully the user employed Axcrypt or Truecrypt to encrypt the live data on their drive prior to the theft.
Until recently when computer security wasn’t as prominent as it is today, people just threw their old hard drives away ! Most didn’t consider criminals would retrieve the drives from the refuse centres and recover the contents looking for useful passwords and numbers etc.
Now more people are aware of this risk they can use Eraser to overwrite the entire contents of the drive prior to disposal rendering it useless to criminals. Actually now that users can feel secure in the knowledge that no data can be recovered from an erased drive they can donate the drive to a friend or charity.
So in conclusion Eraser provides considerably more security to the law abiding public than it does to criminals.
Eraser is clearly not encryption software but it does suffer from the same irrational allegations of it only being used by criminals in helping destroy evidence against them.
It is true that Eraser could be used by criminals to destroy evidence from a computer hard drive. Should it be banned ? Well if so then you need to also ban computers as the very crime that Eraser is accused of covering up was clearly committed on a computer !
Hard drives are so cheap today that any criminal using a computer to commit a crime would think nothing of physically destroying an inexpensive disk to cover their tracks. Eraser is little use or gain to criminals.
Eraser is however very useful in preventing crime !
When an Eraser user wipes their free space or securely erases a confidential file containing bank details, customer records, credit card details, personal medical records, insurance details, women’s refuge address’s, witness names and address’s, witness statements, passwords, private letters, safe combinations, private diaries, companies unpatented work, voter details, copyrighted material, etc, etc, etc, you get the idea ! That Eraser user is safe in the knowledge that should their computer be stolen the information within the free space is securely overwritten and of no use to the criminal. Hopefully the user employed Axcrypt or Truecrypt to encrypt the live data on their drive prior to the theft.
Until recently when computer security wasn’t as prominent as it is today, people just threw their old hard drives away ! Most didn’t consider criminals would retrieve the drives from the refuse centres and recover the contents looking for useful passwords and numbers etc.
Now more people are aware of this risk they can use Eraser to overwrite the entire contents of the drive prior to disposal rendering it useless to criminals. Actually now that users can feel secure in the knowledge that no data can be recovered from an erased drive they can donate the drive to a friend or charity.
So in conclusion Eraser provides considerably more security to the law abiding public than it does to criminals.